About your Search

20121027
20121104
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7
care, of course, you know, two different directions in health care; right? president obama is elected. obamacare becomes the law of the land for sure. it becomes institutionalized. it becomes nothing's impossible, but it becomes close to impossible to reverse four years from now. it'll be operating then. people will have moved over, building, tremendous changes, mandate would have been enforced already. 20,000irs agents will be hired which is absolutely crazy. just what we need, 20,000 more irs agents, and there's almost no way to stop that because even if you have a republican house, which i think is almost forture, nothing in life for sure, but it almost is. if you have a republican senate, unlikely if obama is legislated, but possible, well, he can veto any attempt they would make to overturn obamacare. american people in re-elected president obama are reenforcing obamacare and accepting that as their future. if a president romney is elected, even without a republican senate, with the basically the president votes in the house about the same and the senate within one or two votes b
, there is no indication that the obama administration is willing to clearly recognize iran's right to enriched uranium on its own soil. and, therefore, there won't be a deal. even if there's no deal and iran doesn't collapse, some policy elites continue to posit that sanctions and their version of diplomacy is all worth it. it is worth any and because iranians, middle eastern publics, and americans most importantly will come to see that iran's is suffering and inability to get a deal on the nuclear issue is the iranian government's fault. and, therefore, it will be understandable, and even justified for the united states in the end to strike iran militarily. but we should have no illusions about the strategic consequences of an overt war with the islamic republic. any new overt use of u.s. force to disarm yet another middle eastern state of weapons of mass destruction that it does not have, while staying quiet about israel's 200 plus nuclear weapons arsenal, would elevate already high level of anti-american sentiment in the middle east, threaten our remaining allies there, and render their cooperation
that the supreme court did what it did right at the turn of the obama administration with the two or three high-profile terrorism cases it had before it. it was saying, hey, show us what you've got. we'll give you another chance. so i think, you know, there's always going to be pressure on the executive branch no matter what else is true to go as far as possible within the limits of law to protect national security, and we should want it that way. um, but we also should accept that that's going to be true and create defense mechanisms toward it, to sort of, you know, put pressure on in the other direction. >> glenn, you look like you had -- okay. i think we should open it up. we don't have a lot of time left, and this is the last panel. i think we should open it up to the floor. um, if anybody has any questions, and i don't know where the microphones are. are they anywhere nearby? this one first. you have to wait, sorry. >> thank you. picking up on something that mr. rizzo said that the cia will resist to death, apparently, any attempt to impose standards of what constitutes national security o
to do. i would be proud to carry the legislation as i was proud to carry the legislation to defund obama. i would be proud to repeal obamacare. >> moderator: all right. now jill. >> speaking specifically about president obama, and i'd have to ask the question differently. i'll start with congressman rehberg where has the president failed montana and how would you fix it? rehberg: in the health care reform to reform health care. it added people to a system that is already failing. i think the stimulus was failing. it failed. our solution is not necessarily put money in to a one-time expenditure. it was to build asset. we want to try to suspend payroll taxes on employers and employees for a period of year. it would have put money in the hands of every small business. the florist, the complarkter, the engineer, i would suggest new regulation coming out of unelected bureaucrats are destroying diswhroobs build montana. costing us employees and other 10 million year every year from our economy. cap-and-trade, i don't understand why -- for the you utility and hurting our coal, oil and gas indus
because mitt romney got it right. looking at president obama and said, you know, my way or the highway, that's what obamacare was, congressman. there was not a single republican vote for it. not one. if you wantedded -- wanted to see bipartisanship, why not cross the aisle to get ideas from republicans? with that many republicans, you couldn't say there there was not least one good idea. then go to your caucus bringing these guys. no, sir. you went the partisan route and voted that line. that's unfortunate. you know, we need to fix much in washington, and every now and then, it's suggested richard mourdock doesn't know how washington workings. that's the problem. it's not working. it is because of the partisanship like mr. donnelly that says one thing, back in the state, say one thing in the district, and then go back and consistently, unfortunately, cave into harry reid, nancy pelosi. he said he was not going to support pelosi for speaker. he got there, guess what? he did, twais. twice. that's a pattern. that's not going to fix washington, but going to continue to make it worse, congr
of a role to play, too. it's not a coincidence that the supreme court did what it did right at the turn of the obama administration would do two or three high-profile terrorism cases because he was saying hey, show us what you've got. we'll give you another chance. so i think there's always going to be pressure to matter what else is true to go as far as possible within the limits of law to protect national security and we should want that way, but we should also accept and create the bench mechanisms to sort of put pressure on the other direction. >> i think we should open it up here but don't have a lot of time left to mrs. glass panel. i think we should open it up to the floor. if anybody has any questions. i don't know where the microphones are. are they anywhere nearby? you have to wait, sorry. >> thank you. picking up on something that mr. rizzo said that the cia will resist any attempt to impose what constitutes national security or a threat to national security, such as ms. vladeck suggested. and also the fact that he talked about the national interest of the united states. then
capital formation. the current tax rate dividends are% out i guess you can see right there 15 f. obama has this way, almost tripling the dividend tax increase. it's going to be about 50% or so increase the tax-free capital gains. if you love or the tax tax return on investing, you're basically going to love her the amount of investment taking place. so we have to resolve issues, which basically confront us and probably nothing's going to happen until november 6 received a leader of the country and who controls congress. these are factors we have to worry about. now my observation was to go back early into my career. i say that what the big smile and certain sense of modesty, but i got my mba from columbia in january 311967. fas child was at business school for six months old when i graduated. i had no money in the bank like national defense education and student loans to repay. so i'm sure you've learned if you have liability no asset to make it if not worse. i hope you are not an basically had no choice but to go to work immediately. the very next day, february 1st 1967 i thought of my go
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)